↓ Skip to main content

An ongoing case-control study to evaluate the NHS breast screening programme

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An ongoing case-control study to evaluate the NHS breast screening programme
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-596
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalie J Massat, Peter D Sasieni, Dharmishta Parmar, Stephen W Duffy

Abstract

In England, a national breast screening programme (NHSBSP) has been in place since 1988, and assessment of its impact on breast cancer incidence and mortality is essential to ensure that the programme is indeed doing more good than harm. This article describes large observation studies designed to estimate the effects of the current programme in terms of the benefits on breast cancer incidence and mortality and detrimental effect in terms of overdiagnosis. The case-control design of the cervical screening programme evaluation was highly effective in informing policy on screening intervals and age ranges. We propose innovative selection of cases and controls and gathering of additional variables to address new outcomes of interest and develop new methodologies to control for potential sources of bias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#6,831,696
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,791
of 8,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,639
of 307,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#21
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.