Title |
Log-binomial models: exploring failed convergence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-7622-10-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tyler Williamson, Misha Eliasziw, Gordon Hilton Fick |
Abstract |
Relative risk is a summary metric that is commonly used in epidemiological investigations. Increasingly, epidemiologists are using log-binomial models to study the impact of a set of predictor variables on a single binary outcome, as they naturally offer relative risks. However, standard statistical software may report failed convergence when attempting to fit log-binomial models in certain settings. The methods that have been proposed in the literature for dealing with failed convergence use approximate solutions to avoid the issue. This research looks directly at the log-likelihood function for the simplest log-binomial model where failed convergence has been observed, a model with a single linear predictor with three levels. The possible causes of failed convergence are explored and potential solutions are presented for some cases. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 31% |
United States | 3 | 23% |
Kuwait | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
Researcher | 24 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Mathematics | 10 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 13% |
Unknown | 50 | 29% |