↓ Skip to main content

Action ethical dilemmas in surgery: an interview study of practicing surgeons

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Action ethical dilemmas in surgery: an interview study of practicing surgeons
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-6-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsti Torjuul, Ann Nordam, Venke Sørlie

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the kinds of ethical dilemmas surgeons face during practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 16 28%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,288,160
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#808
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,204
of 56,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.