↓ Skip to main content

Women and HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS Research and Therapy, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 637)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women and HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
AIDS Research and Therapy, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-6405-10-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gita Ramjee, Brodie Daniels

Abstract

Thirty years since the discovery of HIV, the HIV pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa accounts for more than two thirds of the world's HIV infections. Southern Africa remains the region most severely affected by the epidemic. Women continue to bear the brunt of the epidemic with young women infected almost ten years earlier compared to their male counterparts. Epidemiological evidence suggests unacceptably high HIV prevalence and incidence rates among women. A multitude of factors increase women's vulnerability to HIV acquisition, including, biological, behavioral, socioeconomic, cultural and structural risks. There is no magic bullet and behavior alone is unlikely to change the course of the epidemic. Considerable progress has been made in biomedical, behavioral and structural strategies for HIV prevention with attendant challenges of developing appropriate HIV prevention packages which take into consideration the socioeconomic and cultural context of women in society at large.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 597 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 158 26%
Student > Bachelor 80 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 9%
Researcher 55 9%
Student > Postgraduate 35 6%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 147 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 13%
Social Sciences 78 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 6%
Psychology 20 3%
Other 97 16%
Unknown 163 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#754,891
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from AIDS Research and Therapy
#4
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,727
of 320,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS Research and Therapy
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.