↓ Skip to main content

Promoting state health department evidence-based cancer and chronic disease prevention: a multi-phase dissemination study with a cluster randomized trial component

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting state health department evidence-based cancer and chronic disease prevention: a multi-phase dissemination study with a cluster randomized trial component
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peg Allen, Sonia Sequeira, Rebekah R Jacob, Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino, Katherine A Stamatakis, Jenine K Harris, Lindsay Elliott, Jon F Kerner, Ellen Jones, Maureen Dobbins, Elizabeth A Baker, Ross C Brownson

Abstract

Cancer and other chronic diseases reduce quality and length of life and productivity, and represent a significant financial burden to society. Evidence-based public health approaches to prevent cancer and other chronic diseases have been identified in recent decades and have the potential for high impact. Yet, barriers to implement prevention approaches persist as a result of multiple factors including lack of organizational support, limited resources, competing emerging priorities and crises, and limited skill among the public health workforce. The purpose of this study is to learn how best to promote the adoption of evidence based public health practice related to chronic disease prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Social Sciences 17 13%
Psychology 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 47 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,744,206
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,439
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,106
of 321,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.