↓ Skip to main content

Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-292
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Beard, Andrew Price, Jonathan Cook, Ray Fitzpatrick, Andrew Carr, Marion Campbell, Helen Doll, Helen Campbell, Nigel Arden, Cushla Cooper, Loretta Davies, David Murray

Abstract

In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology.The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 19 14%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 42 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 52 37%