↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Biomass digestibility is predominantly affected by three factors of wall polymer features distinctive in wheat accessions and rice mutants

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomass digestibility is predominantly affected by three factors of wall polymer features distinctive in wheat accessions and rice mutants
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-6-183
Pubmed ID
24341349
Authors

Zhiliang Wu, Mingliang Zhang, Lingqiang Wang, Yuanyuan Tu, Jing Zhang, Guosheng Xie, Weihua Zou, Fengcheng Li, Kai Guo, Qing Li, Chunbao Gao, Liangcai Peng

Abstract

Wheat and rice are important food crops with enormous biomass residues for biofuels. However, lignocellulosic recalcitrance becomes a crucial factor on biomass process. Plant cell walls greatly determine biomass recalcitrance, thus it is essential to identify their key factors on lignocellulose saccharification. Despite it has been reported about cell wall factors on biomass digestions, little is known in wheat and rice. In this study, we analyzed nine typical pairs of wheat and rice samples that exhibited distinct cell wall compositions, and identified three major factors of wall polymer features that affected biomass digestibility.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 29%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Engineering 7 8%
Chemistry 6 7%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,271,191
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#789
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,831
of 310,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.