↓ Skip to main content

Biomass digestibility is predominantly affected by three factors of wall polymer features distinctive in wheat accessions and rice mutants

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomass digestibility is predominantly affected by three factors of wall polymer features distinctive in wheat accessions and rice mutants
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-6-183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiliang Wu, Mingliang Zhang, Lingqiang Wang, Yuanyuan Tu, Jing Zhang, Guosheng Xie, Weihua Zou, Fengcheng Li, Kai Guo, Qing Li, Chunbao Gao, Liangcai Peng

Abstract

Wheat and rice are important food crops with enormous biomass residues for biofuels. However, lignocellulosic recalcitrance becomes a crucial factor on biomass process. Plant cell walls greatly determine biomass recalcitrance, thus it is essential to identify their key factors on lignocellulose saccharification. Despite it has been reported about cell wall factors on biomass digestions, little is known in wheat and rice. In this study, we analyzed nine typical pairs of wheat and rice samples that exhibited distinct cell wall compositions, and identified three major factors of wall polymer features that affected biomass digestibility.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 31%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Engineering 7 9%
Chemistry 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 13 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,216,485
of 6,229,233 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#166
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,707
of 144,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,229,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.