↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial permeability transition pore induces mitochondria injury in Huntington disease

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitochondrial permeability transition pore induces mitochondria injury in Huntington disease
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1326-8-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo A Quintanilla, Youngnam N Jin, Rommy von Bernhardi, Gail VW Johnson

Abstract

Mitochondrial impairment has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Huntington's disease (HD). However, how mutant huntingtin impairs mitochondrial function and thus contributes to HD has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we used striatal cells expressing wild type (STHdhQ7/Q7) or mutant (STHdhQ111/Q111) huntingtin protein, and cortical neurons expressing the exon 1 of the huntingtin protein with physiological or pathological polyglutamine domains, to examine the interrelationship among specific mitochondrial functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Chemistry 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#813
of 976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,799
of 320,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.