↓ Skip to main content

Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah M Ivers, Karen Tu, Jacqueline Young, Jill J Francis, Jan Barnsley, Baiju R Shah, Ross E Upshur, Rahim Moineddin, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Merrick Zwarenstein

Abstract

Audit and feedback to physicians is a commonly used quality improvement strategy, but its optimal design is unknown. This trial tested the effects of a theory-informed worksheet to facilitate goal setting and action planning, appended to feedback reports on chronic disease management, compared to feedback reports provided without these worksheets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 29%
Psychology 25 14%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 36 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,587,850
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#906
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,395
of 286,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.