You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of patient-centered rehabilitation model targeting older persons with a hip fracture, including those with cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-13-136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine S McGilton, Aileen M Davis, Gary Naglie, Nizar Mahomed, John Flannery, Susan Jaglal, Cheryl Cott, Steven Stewart |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes for older persons post-hip fracture repair, including those with cognitive impairment (CI), following implementation of a novel model of care - the Patient-Centered Rehabilitation Model including persons with CI (PCRM-CI). The PCRM-CI is an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program that incorporates education for healthcare professionals (HCPs), including nurses, which is focused on geriatric care including management of dementia and delirium, support for HCPs from an Advanced Practice Nurse, and family support and education. Primary outcome measures were mobility gain from admission to discharge and whether or not patients returned home post-discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Librarian | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 23% |
| Unknown | 44 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 22% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,184,832
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,119
of 3,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,325
of 307,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.