↓ Skip to main content

Role of nonhuman primate models in the discovery and clinical development of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs)

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of nonhuman primate models in the discovery and clinical development of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs)
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, October 2006
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-4-s1-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristof Chwalisz, Ramesh Garg, Robert Brenner, Ov Slayden, Craig Winkel, Walter Elger

Abstract

Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) represent a new class of progesterone receptor ligands that exert clinically relevant tissue-selective progesterone agonist, antagonist, partial, or mixed agonist/antagonist effects on various progesterone target tissues in an in vivo situation depending on the biological action studied. The SPRM asoprisnil is being studied in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata and endometriosis. Asoprisnil shows a high degree of uterine selectivity as compared to effects on ovulation or ovarian hormone secretion in humans. It induces amenorrhea and decreases leiomyoma volume in a dose-dependent manner in the presence of follicular phase estrogen concentrations. It also has endometrial antiproliferative effects. In pregnant animals, the myometrial, i.e. labor-inducing, effects of asoprisnil are blunted or absent. Studies in non-human primates played a key role during the preclinical development of selective progesterone receptor modulators. These studies provided the first evidence of uterus-selective effects of asoprisnil and structurally related compounds, and the rationale for clinical development of asoprisnil.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Other 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,526,794
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#287
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,338
of 66,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.