↓ Skip to main content

An efficient immunodetection method for histone modifications in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An efficient immunodetection method for histone modifications in plants
Published in
Plant Methods, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-9-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geovanny Nic-Can, Sara Hernández-Castellano, Angela Kú-González, Víctor M Loyola-Vargas, Clelia De-la-Peña

Abstract

Epigenetic mechanisms can be highly dynamic, but the cross-talk among them and with the genome is still poorly understood. Many of these mechanisms work at different places in the cell and at different times of organism development. Covalent histone modifications are one of the most complex and studied epigenetic mechanisms involved in cellular reprogramming and development in plants. Therefore, the knowledge of the spatial distribution of histone methylation in different tissues is important to understand their behavior on specific cells.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Czechia 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 73 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 28%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 23%
Chemistry 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Unknown 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2017.
All research outputs
#12,543,327
of 21,357,544 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#572
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,123
of 303,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,357,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.