↓ Skip to main content

The Nordic long-term OCD treatment study (NordLOTS): rationale, design, and methods

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 508)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Nordic long-term OCD treatment study (NordLOTS): rationale, design, and methods
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-7-41
Pubmed ID
Abstract

This paper describes and discusses the methodology of the Nordic long-term OCD-treatment study (NordLOTS). The purpose of this effectiveness study was to study treatment outcome of CBT, to identify CBT non- or partial responders and to investigate whether an increased number of CBT-sessions or sertraline treatment gives the best outcome; to identify treatment refractory patients and to investigate the outcome of aripiprazole augmentation; to study the outcome over a three year period for each responder including the risk of relapse, and finally to study predictors, moderators and mediators of treatment response.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,123,213
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#32
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,540
of 272,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.