↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin H Freed, Akhil Narang, Nicole M Bhave, Peter Czobor, Victor Mor-Avi, Emily R Zaran, Kristen M Turner, Kevin P Cavanaugh, Sonal Chandra, Sara M Tanaka, Michael H Davidson, Roberto M Lang, Amit R Patel

Abstract

Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A2A receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is not well described. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of a normal regadenoson perfusion CMR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#10,373,937
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#792
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,197
of 272,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#35
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.