↓ Skip to main content

Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn Stacey, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Jeff Belkora, B Joyce Davison, Marie-Anne Durand, Karen B Eden, Aubri S Hoffman, Mirjam Koerner, France Légaré, Marie-Chantal Loiselle, Richard L Street

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 163 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 48 29%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Psychology 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 34 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,170,813
of 4,504,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#660
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,021
of 120,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#39
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,504,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.