↓ Skip to main content

The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
471 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
774 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Breivik, Elon Eisenberg, Tony O’Brien

Abstract

Chronic pain is common in Europe and elsewhere and its under treatment confers a substantial burden on individuals, employers, healthcare systems and society in general. Indeed, the personal and socioeconomic impact of chronic pain is as great as, or greater, than that of other established healthcare priorities. In light of review of recently published data confirming its clinical and socioeconomic impact, this paper argues that chronic pain should be ranked alongside other conditions of established priority in Europe. We outline strategies to help overcome barriers to effective pain care resulting in particular from deficiencies in education and access to interdisciplinary pain management services. We also address the confusion that exists between proper clinical and scientific uses of opioid medications and their potential for misuse and diversion, as reflected in international variations in the access to, and availability of, these agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 774 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Jordan 1 <1%
Unknown 765 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 135 17%
Student > Bachelor 99 13%
Researcher 91 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 12%
Other 50 6%
Other 121 16%
Unknown 187 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 20%
Psychology 90 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 9%
Neuroscience 49 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 4%
Other 146 19%
Unknown 229 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#938,579
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,014
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,852
of 326,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.