You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A holistic high-throughput screening framework for biofuel feedstock assessment that characterises variations in soluble sugars and cell wall composition in Sorghum bicolor
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1754-6834-6-186 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antony P Martin, William M Palmer, Caitlin S Byrt, Robert T Furbank, Christopher PL Grof |
Abstract |
A major hindrance to the development of high yielding biofuel feedstocks is the ability to rapidly assess large populations for fermentable sugar yields. Whilst recent advances have outlined methods for the rapid assessment of biomass saccharification efficiency, none take into account the total biomass, or the soluble sugar fraction of the plant. Here we present a holistic high-throughput methodology for assessing sweet Sorghum bicolor feedstocks at 10 days post-anthesis for total fermentable sugar yields including stalk biomass, soluble sugar concentrations, and cell wall saccharification efficiency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Philippines | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 48% |
Engineering | 7 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#997
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,651
of 320,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.