↓ Skip to main content

Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 706)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design?
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-3-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen van Wilgenburg, Gerard Driessen, Leo W Beukeboom

Abstract

The haplodiploid sex determining mechanism in Hymenoptera (males are haploid, females are diploid) has played an important role in the evolution of this insect order. In Hymenoptera sex is usually determined by a single locus, heterozygotes are female and hemizygotes are male. Under inbreeding, homozygous diploid and sterile males occur which form a genetic burden for a population. We review life history and genetical traits that may overcome the disadvantages of single locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD). Behavioural adaptations to avoid matings between relatives include active dispersal from natal patches and mating preferences for non-relatives. In non-social species, temporal and spatial segregation of male and female offspring reduces the burden of sl-CSD. In social species, diploid males are produced at the expense of workers and female reproductives. In some social species, diploid males and diploid male producing queens are killed by workers. Diploid male production may have played a role in the evolution or maintenance of polygyny (multiple queens) and polyandry (multiple mating). Some forms of thelytoky (parthenogenetic female production) increase homozygosity and are therefore incompatible with sl-CSD. We discuss a number of hypothetical adaptations to sl-CSD which should be considered in future studies of this insect order.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 260 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 20%
Researcher 48 17%
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 188 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 11%
Environmental Science 8 3%
Engineering 3 1%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 36 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#765,977
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#41
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,553
of 177,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them