You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide successful predicts cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field: a prospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc7009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miran Kolar, Miljenko Križmarić, Petra Klemen, Štefek Grmec |
| Abstract |
Prognosis in patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is poor. Higher survival rates have been observed only in patients with ventricular fibrillation who were fortunate enough to have basic and advanced life support initiated soon after cardiac arrest. An ability to predict cardiac arrest outcomes would be useful for resuscitation. Changes in expired end-tidal carbon dioxide levels during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be a useful, noninvasive predictor of successful resuscitation and survival from cardiac arrest, and could help in determining when to cease CPR efforts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 17 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 70% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,947,260
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,734
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,088
of 99,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.