You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-binding by YY1 identifies the transcriptionally active, highly conserved set of CTCF-bound regions in primate genomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petra C Schwalie, Michelle C Ward, Carolyn E Cain, Andre J Faure, Yoav Gilad, Duncan T Odom, Paul Flicek |
| Abstract |
The genomic binding of CTCF is highly conserved across mammals, but the mechanisms that underlie its stability are poorly understood. One transcription factor known to functionally interact with CTCF in the context of X-chromosome inactivation is the ubiquitously expressed YY1. Because combinatorial transcription factor binding can contribute to the evolutionary stabilization of regulatory regions, we tested whether YY1 and CTCF co-binding could in part account for conservation of CTCF binding. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 37% |
| Researcher | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,158
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,759
of 318,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#88
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.