↓ Skip to main content

Renal transplant patient acceptance of a self-management support system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renal transplant patient acceptance of a self-management support system
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12911-017-0456-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenxin Wang, Céline L. van Lint, Willem-Paul Brinkman, Ton J. M. Rövekamp, Sandra van Dijk, Paul J. M. van der Boog, Mark A. Neerincx

Abstract

Self-management support systems (SMSS) have been proposed for renal transplant patients to increase their autonomy and reduce the number of hospital visits. For the design and implementation of such systems, it is important to understand factors influencing patients' acceptance of a SMSS. This paper aims to identify these key factors. From literature, possible factors and related questionnaire items were identified. Afterwards, focus groups with experts and patients were conducted to adapt the items to the application domain. To investigate acceptance of a SMSS and the influencing factors, fifty renal transplant patients answered the questionnaire before and after using the SMSS for 4 months. All the questionnaire constructs had a satisfactory or higher level of reliability. After using the SMSS for 4 months, trust and performance expectancy could explain part of the variation in behavioural intention of using the SMSS, but not beyond the explanation given by patients' affect towards the system, which accounted for 26% of the variance. We anticipate that in future caregivers implementing a SMSS will benefit from taking steps to improve patients' affect as this was found to correlate with patients use intention. The study was registered in ToetsingOnline, a registry held by the Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. The registration number is NL33387.058.11 , and the date of registration is 31st July 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 18%
Psychology 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Computer Science 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,477,666
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#984
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,434
of 310,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.