Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry

Tat Woon Chao, Liam Geraghty, Pandelis Dimitriou, Simon Talbot

Femoral component malrotation is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. The sulcus line (SL) is more accurate than Whiteside's line as it corrects for variation in the coronal orientation of the groove. The hypothesis is that averaging the SL and posterior condylar axis (PCA) will reduce femoral malrotation. The component was inserted at a position between the SL and PCA in 91 patients. An intraoperative photograph was taken showing the landmarks. These were compared to the component position achieved relative to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) on a postoperative CT scan. The component position was compared to the position achieved using the individual landmarks. Relative to the SEA, the final component position was 0.6° (SD 1.4°, range -3.8° to +4.0°), the coronally corrected SL position was -0.7° (SD 2.3°, -5.5° to +4.6°), the PCA position was 0.9° (SD 1.9°, -6.1° to +5.0°). Averaging the landmarks significantly decreased the variance of the component position compared to using the SL and PCA individually. The number of outliers (>3° from SEA) was also significantly less (p < 0.05) for the average position (2/84) when each was compared to the SL (16/84) and PCA (14/84) individually. In 21/84 (25%) of cases, there was more than 4° of divergence between the SL and PCA. Averaging the SL and the PCA decreases femoral component malrotation. Femora are frequently asymmetrical in the axial plane. Referencing posterior condyles alone to set rotation is likely to cause high rates of patellofemoral malalignment.