You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A review of life expectancy and infant mortality estimations for Australian Aboriginal people
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bronwen Phillips, Stephen Morrell, Richard Taylor, John Daniels |
Abstract |
Significant variation exists in published Aboriginal mortality and life expectancy (LE) estimates due to differing and evolving methodologies required to correct for inadequate recording of Aboriginality in death data, under-counting of Aboriginal people in population censuses, and unexplained growth in the Aboriginal population attributed to changes in the propensity of individuals to identify as Aboriginal at population censuses.The objective of this paper is to analyse variation in reported Australian Aboriginal mortality in terms of LE and infant mortality rates (IMR), compared with all Australians. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 17% |
Psychology | 4 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#5,948,434
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,883
of 15,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,589
of 308,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#105
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.