↓ Skip to main content

Obesity reduces left ventricular strains, torsion, and synchrony in mouse models: a cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obesity reduces left ventricular strains, torsion, and synchrony in mouse models: a cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sage P Kramer, David K Powell, Christopher M Haggerty, Cassi M Binkley, Andrea C Mattingly, Lisa A Cassis, Frederick H Epstein, Brandon K Fornwalt

Abstract

Obesity affects a third of adults in the US and results in an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. While the mechanisms underlying this increased risk are not well understood, animal models of obesity have shown direct effects on the heart such as steatosis and fibrosis, which may affect cardiac function. However, the effect of obesity on cardiac function in animal models is not well-defined. We hypothesized that diet-induced obesity in mice reduces strain, torsion, and synchrony in the left ventricle (LV).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 7%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 54 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Engineering 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#22,889,200
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,287
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,707
of 319,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.