↓ Skip to main content

Safety of three different product doses in autologous chondrocyte implantation: results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety of three different product doses in autologous chondrocyte implantation: results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0570-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Becher, Volker Laute, Stefan Fickert, Wolfgang Zinser, Philipp Niemeyer, Thilo John, Peter Diehl, Thomas Kolombe, Rainer Siebold, Jakob Fay

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the three dose levels of the three-dimensional autologous chondrocyte implantation product chondrosphere® in the treatment of cartilage defects (4-10 cm(2)) of knee joints. We hereby report the safety results for a 36-month post-treatment observation period. This was a prospective phase II trial with a clinical intervention comprising biopsy for culturing spheroids and their subsequent administration (level of evidence: I). Patients' knee defects were investigated by arthroscopy, and a cartilage biopsy was taken for culturing. Patients were randomised, on a single-blind basis, to treatment at the dose levels 3-7 (low), 10-30 (medium) or 40-70 (high) spheroids per square centimetre. Assessment (adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiography, physical examination, concomitant medication and laboratory values) took place 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after chondrocyte implantation. Seventy-five patients were included and 73 treated. The incidence of adverse events, of patients with adverse events and of patients with treatment-related adverse events showed no relevant difference between the treatment groups. There were no fatal adverse events, no adverse events led to premature withdrawal from the trial and none led to permanent sequelae. Two patients experienced serious adverse events considered related to the study treatment: arthralgia 2-3 years after implantation and chondropathy 1 and 2 years after implantation. The treatment with chondrosphere® was generally well tolerated. No relationship was detected between any safety criteria and the dose level: Differences between the dose groups in the incidence of any adverse events, and in numbers of patients with treatment-related adverse events, were insubstantial. clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01225575 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,557,501
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#162
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,247
of 310,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.