Title |
Acceptance of Evolution Increases with Student Academic Level: A Comparison Between a Secular and a Religious College
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evolution: Education and Outreach, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12052-009-0175-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guillermo Paz-y-Miño C., Avelina Espinosa |
Abstract |
Acceptance of evolution among the general public, high schools, teachers, and scientists has been documented in the USA; little is known about college students' views on evolution; this population is relevant since it transits from a high-school/parent-protective environment to an independent role in societal decisions. Here we compare perspectives about evolution, creationism, and intelligent design (ID) between a secular (S) and a religious (R) college in the Northeastern USA. Interinstitutional comparisons showed that 64% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 42/62% (S/R) nonmajors supported the exclusive teaching of evolution in science classes; 24/29% (S/R) biology majors vs. 26/38% (S/R) nonmajors perceived ID as both alternative to evolution and/or scientific theory about the origin of life; 76% (mean S + R) biology majors and nonmajors accepted evolutionary explanations about the origin of life; 86% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 79% (mean S + R) nonmajors preferred science courses where human evolution is discussed; 76% (mean S+R) biology majors vs. 79% (mean S + R) nonmajors welcomed questions about evolution in exams and/or thought that such questions should always be in exams; and 66% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 46% (mean S + R) nonmajors admitted they accept evolution openly and/or privately. Intrainstitutional comparisons showed that overall acceptance of evolution among biologists (S or R) increased gradually from the freshman to the senior year, due to exposure to upper-division courses with evolutionary content. College curricular/pedagogical reform should fortify evolution literacy at all education levels, particularly among nonbiologists. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Thailand | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 14% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 38% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 24% |