↓ Skip to main content

Steroid receptor expression in the fish inner earvaries with sex, social status, and reproductive state

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steroid receptor expression in the fish inner earvaries with sex, social status, and reproductive state
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-11-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen P Maruska, Russell D Fernald

Abstract

Gonadal and stress-related steroid hormones are known to influence auditory function across vertebrates but the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for steroid-mediated auditory plasticity at the level of the inner ear remain unknown. The presence of steroid receptors in the ear suggests a direct pathway for hormones to act on the peripheral auditory system, but little is known about which receptors are expressed in the ear or whether their expression levels change with internal physiological state or external social cues. We used qRT-PCR to measure mRNA expression levels of multiple steroid receptor subtypes (estrogen receptors: ERalpha, ERbetaa, ERbetab; androgen receptors: ARalpha, ARbeta; corticosteroid receptors: GR2, GR1a/b, MR) and aromatase in the main hearing organ of the inner ear (saccule) in the highly social African cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni, and tested whether these receptor levels were correlated with circulating steroid concentrations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Portugal 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 29%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 11 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Professor 6 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 49%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Psychology 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,399,716
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#547
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,927
of 94,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.