↓ Skip to main content

Genomic imprinting does not reduce the dosage of UBE3A in neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Epigenetics & Chromatin, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic imprinting does not reduce the dosage of UBE3A in neurons
Published in
Epigenetics & Chromatin, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13072-017-0134-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul R. Hillman, Sarah G. B. Christian, Ryan Doan, Noah D. Cohen, Kranti Konganti, Kory Douglas, Xu Wang, Paul B. Samollow, Scott V. Dindot

Abstract

The ubiquitin protein E3A ligase gene (UBE3A) gene is imprinted with maternal-specific expression in neurons and biallelically expressed in all other cell types. Both loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations affecting the dosage of UBE3A are associated with several neurodevelopmental syndromes and psychological conditions, suggesting that UBE3A is dosage-sensitive in the brain. The observation that loss of imprinting increases the dosage of UBE3A in brain further suggests that inactivation of the paternal UBE3A allele evolved as a dosage-regulating mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we examined UBE3A transcript and protein levels among cells, tissues, and species with different imprinting states of UBE3A. Overall, we found no correlation between the imprinting status and dosage of UBE3A. Importantly, we found that maternal Ube3a protein levels increase in step with decreasing paternal Ube3a protein levels during neurogenesis in mouse, fully compensating for loss of expression of the paternal Ube3a allele in neurons. Based on our findings, we propose that imprinting of UBE3A does not function to reduce the dosage of UBE3A in neurons but rather to regulate some other, as yet unknown, aspect of gene expression or protein function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 29%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 30%
Neuroscience 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,231,278
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#401
of 615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,317
of 324,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.