↓ Skip to main content

Results from early programmatic implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF testing in nine countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Results from early programmatic implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF testing in nine countries
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Creswell, Andrew J Codlin, Emmanuel Andre, Mark A Micek, Ahmed Bedru, E Jane Carter, Rajendra-Prasad Yadav, Andrei Mosneaga, Bishwa Rai, Sayera Banu, Miranda Brouwer, Lucie Blok, Suvanand Sahu, Lucica Ditiu

Abstract

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay has garnered significant interest as a sensitive and rapid diagnostic tool to improve detection of sensitive and drug resistant tuberculosis. However, most existing literature has described the performance of MTB/RIF testing only in study conditions; little information is available on its use in routine case finding. TB REACH is a multi-country initiative focusing on innovative ways to improve case notification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Cambodia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 15%
Student > Master 40 15%
Other 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 80 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,621,744
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#787
of 7,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,054
of 305,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#13
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.