↓ Skip to main content

Use of time-depth recorders to determine fishing depth of commercial setnets and inform management in Cook Inlet, Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of time-depth recorders to determine fishing depth of commercial setnets and inform management in Cook Inlet, Alaska
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40317-017-0126-y
Authors

David W. Welch, Aswea D. Porter, Paul Winchell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,015,498
of 10,263,476 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#104
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,755
of 264,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,263,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.