↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a primary care based complex intervention to promote self-management in patients presenting psychiatric symptoms: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a primary care based complex intervention to promote self-management in patients presenting psychiatric symptoms: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-14-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Zimmermann, Egina Puschmann, Martin Ebersbach, Anne Daubmann, Susanne Steinmann, Martin Scherer

Abstract

Anxiety, Depression and Somatoform (ADSom) disorders are highly prevalent in primary care. Managing these disorders is time-consuming and requires strong commitment on behalf of the General Practitioners (GPs). Furthermore, the management of these patients is restricted by the high patient turnover rates in primary care practices, especially in the German health care system.In order to address this problem, we implement a complex, low-threshold intervention by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) using a mixture of case management and counseling techniques to promote self-management in these patients. Here we present the protocol of the "Self-Management Support for Anxiety, Depression and Somatoform Disorders in Primary Care" (SMADS)-Study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 209 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 68 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 16%
Psychology 32 15%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 73 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2014.
All research outputs
#19,659,463
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,221
of 5,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,832
of 317,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#61
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.