You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular identification of Lodoicea maldivica (coco de mer) seeds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Medicine, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8546-6-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun-yin Mak, Chuen-shing Mok |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#517
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,083
of 143,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.