↓ Skip to main content

Ways of coping with premenstrual change: development and validation of a premenstrual coping measure

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ways of coping with premenstrual change: development and validation of a premenstrual coping measure
Published in
BMC Women's Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-14-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer R Read, Janette Perz, Jane M Ussher

Abstract

Negative premenstrual change can result in distress for a significant proportion of women. Previous research has suggested that women employ a range of coping strategies and behaviours in order to manage and reduce premenstrual distress. However, as yet there has been no specific scale available to measure premenstrual coping. This research aimed to develop and validate a measure of premenstrual coping which can be used in future investigations of negative premenstrual experience.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Psychology 18 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 33 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,362,736
of 21,358,488 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,085
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,857
of 303,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#32
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,358,488 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.