You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Minocycline and doxycycline therapy in community patients with rheumatoid arthritis: prescribing patterns, patient-level determinants of use, and patient-reported side effects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/ar3491 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher J Smith, Harlan Sayles, Ted R Mikuls, Kaleb Michaud |
Abstract |
Minocycline and doxycycline are safe and moderately effective disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of early, DMARD-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although little is known about their use outside clinical trials. We characterize the use of minocycline and doxycycline in community-dwelling RA patients by examining associated prescribing patterns, patient-level determinants of use, and side-effect profiles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 24% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 44% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,750,637
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#559
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,149
of 150,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.