You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn Kingston, Sheila McDonald, Anne Biringer, Marie-Paule Austin, Kathy Hegadoren, Sarah McDonald, Rebecca Giallo, Arto Ohinmaa, Gerri Lasiuk, Glenda MacQueen, Wendy Sword, Marie Lane-Smith, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten |
| Abstract |
Stress, depression, and anxiety affect 15% to 25% of pregnant women. However, substantial barriers to psychosocial assessment exist, resulting in less than 20% of prenatal care providers assessing and treating mental health problems. Moreover, pregnant women are often reluctant to disclose their mental health concerns to a healthcare provider. Identifying screening and assessment tools and procedures that are acceptable to both women and service providers, cost-effective, and clinically useful is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 20% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 58 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 28% |