↓ Skip to main content

Replacing a Swiss ball for an exercise bench causes variable changes in trunk muscle activity during upper limb strength exercises

Overview of attention for article published in Dynamic Medicine, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Replacing a Swiss ball for an exercise bench causes variable changes in trunk muscle activity during upper limb strength exercises
Published in
Dynamic Medicine, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1476-5918-4-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory J Lehman, Trish Gordon, Jo Langley, Patricia Pemrose, Sara Tregaskis

Abstract

The addition of Swiss balls to conventional exercise programs has recently been adopted. Swiss balls are an unstable surface which may result in an increased need for force output from trunk muscles to provide adequate spinal stability or balance. The aim of the study was to determine whether the addition of a Swiss ball to upper body strength exercises results in consistent increases in trunk muscle activation levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
Sweden 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 88 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 24%
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Professor 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,237,961
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Dynamic Medicine
#10
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,774
of 67,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dynamic Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them