You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using a multi-method, user centred, prospective hazard analysis to assess care quality and patient safety in a care pathway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-7-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne E Dean, Allen Hutchinson, Kamisha Hamilton Escoto, Rod Lawson |
| Abstract |
Care pathways can be complex, often involving multiple care providers and as such are recognised as containing multiple opportunities for error. Prospective hazard analysis methods may be useful for evaluating care provided across primary and secondary care pathway boundaries. These methods take into account the views of users (staff and patients) when determining where potential hazards may lie. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of prospective hazard analysis methods when assessing quality and safety in care pathways that lie across primary and secondary care boundaries. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Researcher | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,215,721
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,075
of 7,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,607
of 69,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.