↓ Skip to main content

Generation of iPSC lines from archived non-cryoprotected biobanked dura mater

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Generation of iPSC lines from archived non-cryoprotected biobanked dura mater
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2051-5960-2-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew A Sproul, Lauren B Vensand, Carmen R Dusenberry, Samson Jacob, Jean Paul G Vonsattel, Daniel J Paull, Michael L Shelanski, John F Crary, Scott A Noggle

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from patients with neurodegenerative disease generally lack neuropathological confirmation, the gold standard for disease classification and grading of severity. The use of tissue with a definitive neuropathological diagnosis would be an ideal source for iPSCs. The challenge to this approach is that the majority of biobanked brain tissue was not meant for growing live cells, and thus was not frozen in the presence of cryoprotectants such as DMSO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 28%
Neuroscience 13 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,150,048
of 24,541,341 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#75
of 1,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,820
of 315,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,541,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.