↓ Skip to main content

Donor age negatively impacts adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell expansion and differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
395 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Donor age negatively impacts adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell expansion and differentiation
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-12-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmood S Choudhery, Michael Badowski, Angela Muise, John Pierce, David T Harris

Abstract

Human adipose tissue is an ideal autologous source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for various regenerative medicine and tissue engineering strategies. Aged patients are one of the primary target populations for many promising applications. It has long been known that advanced age is negatively correlated with an organism's reparative and regenerative potential, but little and conflicting information is available about the effects of age on the quality of human adipose tissue derived MSCs (hAT-MSCs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 291 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 16%
Researcher 45 15%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 60 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 14%
Engineering 15 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 3%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 72 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,442,033
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#396
of 4,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,884
of 305,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#14
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.