You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Community-based health care for indigenous women in Mexico: a qualitative evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-13-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blanca Pelcastre-Villafuerte, Myriam Ruiz, Sergio Meneses, Claudia Amaya, Margarita Márquez, Arianna Taboada, Katherine Careaga |
| Abstract |
Indigenous women in Mexico represent a vulnerable population in which three kinds of discrimination converge (ethnicity, gender and class), having direct repercussions on health status. The discrimination and inequity in health care settings brought this population to the fore as a priority group for institutional action. The objective of this study was to evaluate the processes and performance of the "Casa de la Mujer Indígena", a community based project for culturally and linguistically appropriate service delivery for indigenous women. The evaluation summarizes perspectives from diverse stakeholders involved in the implementation of the model, including users, local authorities, and institutional representatives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Iceland | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 34 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,049,244
of 24,594,795 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,400
of 2,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,579
of 316,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,594,795 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.