↓ Skip to main content

Community-based health care for indigenous women in Mexico: a qualitative evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community-based health care for indigenous women in Mexico: a qualitative evaluation
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-13-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blanca Pelcastre-Villafuerte, Myriam Ruiz, Sergio Meneses, Claudia Amaya, Margarita Márquez, Arianna Taboada, Katherine Careaga

Abstract

Indigenous women in Mexico represent a vulnerable population in which three kinds of discrimination converge (ethnicity, gender and class), having direct repercussions on health status. The discrimination and inequity in health care settings brought this population to the fore as a priority group for institutional action. The objective of this study was to evaluate the processes and performance of the "Casa de la Mujer Indígena", a community based project for culturally and linguistically appropriate service delivery for indigenous women. The evaluation summarizes perspectives from diverse stakeholders involved in the implementation of the model, including users, local authorities, and institutional representatives.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Psychology 13 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 35 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#12,479,064
of 22,104,767 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,219
of 1,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,424
of 308,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#34
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,104,767 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.