↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,822)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
226 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinay Prasad, John PA Ioannidis

Abstract

Abandoning ineffective medical practices and mitigating the risks of untested practices are important for improving patient health and containing healthcare costs. Historically, this process has relied on the evidence base, societal values, cultural tensions, and political sway, but not necessarily in that order. We propose a conceptual framework to guide and prioritize this process, shifting emphasis toward the principles of evidence-based medicine, acknowledging that evidence may still be misinterpreted or distorted by recalcitrant proponents of entrenched practices and other biases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 303 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 16%
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 14%
Other 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 75 24%
Unknown 45 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Psychology 34 11%
Social Sciences 30 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 64 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#265,460
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#12
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,386
of 324,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.