↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid peripheral nerve sheath tumors: report of five cases and detailed review of literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hybrid peripheral nerve sheath tumors: report of five cases and detailed review of literature
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3350-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nasir Ud Din, Zubair Ahmad, Jamshid Abdul-Ghafar, Rashida Ahmed

Abstract

Hybrid peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) have been recognized recently and were first included in the 4th edition of World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of Soft tissue and Bone, published in 2013. These tumors show combined features of more than one type of conventional benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors. The most common combinations are those of schwannoma/perineurioma followed by combinations of neurofibroma/schwannoma and neurofibroma/perineurioma. A detailed literature review of published cases is presented. We have discussed the types and etiology, epidemiology and sites of localization, gross and microscopic appearances and immunohistochemical features of hybrid PNSTs and association of these tumors with tumor syndromes. We have included five cases which were diagnosed in our department as we believe that publication of these new cases is relevant for the improved understanding of these specific tumors. Four of our five patients were males, mean age was 24 years. There was wide variation in the location of these tumors. Mean size of excised tumors was 5.5 cms in the greatest dimensions. Three out of five cases represented hybrid schwannoma/perineurioma histologically. No significant nuclear atypia, mitotic activity or necrosis seen. All five cases were completely excised. All five patients are alive and well at the time of writing with no recurrence. Hybrid PNSTs are distinct tumors and are usually benign. However, rare case reports have described local recurrence and at least two recent case reports have described malignant transformation in these tumors. Further studies on large number of cases are required to determine the exact pathogenetic basis of these tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 19 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,893,544
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,003
of 8,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,438
of 312,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#73
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.