↓ Skip to main content

The Dutch health care performance report: seven years of health care performance assessment in the Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dutch health care performance report: seven years of health care performance assessment in the Netherlands
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-12-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J van den Berg, Dionne S Kringos, Lisanne K Marks, Niek S Klazinga

Abstract

In 2006, the first edition of a monitoring tool for the performance of the Dutch health care system was released: the Dutch Health Care Performance Report (DHCPR). The Netherlands was among the first countries in the world developing such a comprehensive tool for reporting performance on quality, access, and affordability of health care. The tool contains 125 performance indicators; the choice for specific indicators resulted from a dialogue between researchers and policy makers. In the 'policy cycle', the DHCPR can rationally be placed between evaluation (accountability) and agenda-setting (for strategic decision making). In this paper, we reflect on important lessons learned after seven years of health care system performance assessment. These lessons entail the importance of a good conceptual framework for health system performance assessment, the importance of repeated measurement, the strength of combining multiple perspectives (e.g., patient, professional, objective, subjective) on the same issue, the importance of a central role for the patients' perspective in performance assessment, how to deal with the absence of data in relevant domains, the value of international benchmarking and the continuous exchange between researchers and policy makers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 29%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Professor 6 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,827,524
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#418
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,615
of 308,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.