You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health information technology (IT) to improve the care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nephrology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2369-15-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarissa J Diamantidis, Stefan Becker |
| Abstract |
Several reports show that patients with chronic disease who are empowered with information technology (IT) tools for monitoring, training and self-management have improved outcomes, however there are few such applications employed in kidney disease. This review explores the current and potential uses of health IT platforms to advance kidney disease care by offering innovative solutions to inform, engage and communicate with individuals with CKD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,461,674
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#221
of 2,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,757
of 311,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#5
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.