↓ Skip to main content

The diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-14-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Radwa A Noureldin, Songtao Liu, Marcelo S Nacif, Daniel P Judge, Marc K Halushka, Theodore P Abraham, Carolyn Ho, David A Bluemke

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic disease of the heart. HCM is characterized by a wide range of clinical expression, ranging from asymptomatic mutation carriers to sudden cardiac death as the first manifestation of the disease. Over 1000 mutations have been identified, classically in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins. Noninvasive imaging is central to the diagnosis of HCM and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used to characterize morphologic, functional and tissue abnormalities associated with HCM. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical, pathological and imaging features relevant to understanding the diagnosis of HCM. The early and overt phenotypic expression of disease that may be identified by CMR is reviewed. Diastolic dysfunction may be an early marker of the disease, present in mutation carriers prior to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Late gadolinium enhancement by CMR is present in approximately 60% of HCM patients with LVH and may provide novel information regarding risk stratification in HCM. It is likely that integrating genetic advances with enhanced phenotypic characterization of HCM with novel CMR techniques will importantly improve our understanding of this complex disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 292 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Other 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Master 20 7%
Other 70 23%
Unknown 62 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 179 59%
Engineering 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 <1%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 81 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2014.
All research outputs
#17,548,753
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,091
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,269
of 170,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.