↓ Skip to main content

The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
516 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
834 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2003
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-1-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen R Hanney, Miguel A Gonzalez-Block, Martin J Buxton, Maurice Kogan

Abstract

The importance of health research utilisation in policy-making, and of understanding the mechanisms involved, is increasingly recognised. Recent reports calling for more resources to improve health in developing countries, and global pressures for accountability, draw greater attention to research-informed policy-making. Key utilisation issues have been described for at least twenty years, but the growing focus on health research systems creates additional dimensions.The utilisation of health research in policy-making should contribute to policies that may eventually lead to desired outcomes, including health gains. In this article, exploration of these issues is combined with a review of various forms of policy-making. When this is linked to analysis of different types of health research, it assists in building a comprehensive account of the diverse meanings of research utilisation.Previous studies report methods and conceptual frameworks that have been applied, if with varying degrees of success, to record utilisation in policy-making. These studies reveal various examples of research impact within a general picture of underutilisation.Factors potentially enhancing utilisation can be identified by exploration of: priority setting; activities of the health research system at the interface between research and policy-making; and the role of the recipients, or 'receptors', of health research. An interfaces and receptors model provides a framework for analysis.Recommendations about possible methods for assessing health research utilisation follow identification of the purposes of such assessments. Our conclusion is that research utilisation can be better understood, and enhanced, by developing assessment methods informed by conceptual analysis and review of previous studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 834 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 13 2%
Canada 12 1%
United States 9 1%
Spain 8 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Nigeria 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Indonesia 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Other 19 2%
Unknown 754 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 142 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 16%
Student > Master 125 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 43 5%
Other 213 26%
Unknown 120 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 209 25%
Social Sciences 197 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 32 4%
Arts and Humanities 25 3%
Other 170 20%
Unknown 149 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,468,967
of 23,659,844 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#155
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,814
of 131,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,659,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them