↓ Skip to main content

A path analysis of the effects of the doctor-patient encounter and expectancy in an open-label randomized trial of spinal manipulation for the care of low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A path analysis of the effects of the doctor-patient encounter and expectancy in an open-label randomized trial of spinal manipulation for the care of low back pain
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitchell Haas, Darcy Vavrek, Moni B Neradilek, Nayak Polissar

Abstract

The doctor-patient encounter (DPE) and associated patient expectations are potential confounders in open-label randomized trials of treatment efficacy. It is therefore important to evaluate the effects of the DPE on study outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 20%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Unspecified 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,631,944
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#866
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,632
of 306,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#17
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.