You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A path analysis of the effects of the doctor-patient encounter and expectancy in an open-label randomized trial of spinal manipulation for the care of low back pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-14-16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mitchell Haas, Darcy Vavrek, Moni B Neradilek, Nayak Polissar |
Abstract |
The doctor-patient encounter (DPE) and associated patient expectations are potential confounders in open-label randomized trials of treatment efficacy. It is therefore important to evaluate the effects of the DPE on study outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 22% |
Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,631,944
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#866
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,632
of 306,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#17
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.