↓ Skip to main content

Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versusserum creatinine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versusserum creatinine
Published in
BMC Nephrology, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-15-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Delanaye, Etienne Cavalier, Jérôme Morel, Manolie Mehdi, Nicolas Maillard, Guillaume Claisse, Bernard Lambermont, Bernard E Dubois, Pierre Damas, Jean-Marie Krzesinski, Alexandre Lautrette, Christophe Mariat

Abstract

Detecting impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in intensive care units (ICU) in order to diagnose acute kidney injuries and adjust the dose of renally excreted drugs. Whether serum Cystatin C (SCysC) may better reflect glomerular filtration rate than serum creatinine (SCr) in the context of intensive care medicine is uncertain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,906,413
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,141
of 2,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,190
of 306,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#24
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.