↓ Skip to main content

Generation of SNP datasets for orangutan population genomics using improved reduced-representation sequencing and direct comparisons of SNP calling algorithms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Generation of SNP datasets for orangutan population genomics using improved reduced-representation sequencing and direct comparisons of SNP calling algorithms
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maja P Greminger, Kai N Stölting, Alexander Nater, Benoit Goossens, Natasha Arora, Rémy Bruggmann, Andrea Patrignani, Beatrice Nussberger, Reeta Sharma, Robert H S Kraus, Laurentius N Ambu, Ian Singleton, Lounes Chikhi, Carel P van Schaik, Michael Krützen

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing has opened up exciting possibilities in population and conservation genetics by enabling the assessment of genetic variation at genome-wide scales. One approach to reduce genome complexity, i.e. investigating only parts of the genome, is reduced-representation library (RRL) sequencing. Like similar approaches, RRL sequencing reduces ascertainment bias due to simultaneous discovery and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and does not require reference genomes. Yet, generating such datasets remains challenging due to laboratory and bioinformatical issues. In the laboratory, current protocols require improvements with regards to sequencing homologous fragments to reduce the number of missing genotypes. From the bioinformatical perspective, the reliance of most studies on a single SNP caller disregards the possibility that different algorithms may produce disparate SNP datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 110 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Student > Master 21 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,502,946
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,514
of 11,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,458
of 319,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#49
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.