↓ Skip to main content

Altered glial marker expression in autistic post-mortem prefrontal cortex and cerebellum

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Autism, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered glial marker expression in autistic post-mortem prefrontal cortex and cerebellum
Published in
Molecular Autism, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2040-2392-5-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Edmonson, Mark N Ziats, Owen M Rennert

Abstract

The cellular mechanism(s) underlying autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are not completely understood, but ASDs are thought to ultimately result from disrupted synaptogenesis. However, studies have also shown that glial cell numbers and function are abnormal in post-mortem brain tissue from autistic patients. Direct assessment of glial cells in post-mortem human brain tissue is technically challenging, limiting glial research in human ASD studies. Therefore, we attempted to determine if glial cell-type specific markers may be altered in autistic brain tissue in a manner that is consistent with known cellular findings, such that they could serve as a proxy for glial cell numbers and/or activation patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 53 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,441,631
of 24,876,519 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Autism
#356
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,033
of 317,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Autism
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,876,519 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.